Update: An earlier version of this article incorrectly reported that capital inflows into Grayscale Bitcoin Trust declined due to a lack of Wall Street interest. However, Seres Lu, vice president of Grayscale, updated Cointelegraph via email that the capital inflow stopped because the firm closed some of its trusts for administrative purposes. The article has been updated accordingly.
There is a reason why Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) emerged as a benchmark to measure institutional interest in Bitcoin (BTC).
Grayscale no longer the only option for investors
The digital currency investment product was among the only ones that offered hedge funds, endowments, pension funds and family offices a way to gain exposure to Bitcoin without needing them to own the digital asset themselves.
Therefore, a rising capital inflow into GBTC — such as the one reported last year, wherein Wall Street investors deposited about $18.2 billion in the fund — served as a metric to gauge growing institutional interest in the crypto sector. Conversely, a declining capital inflow reflected institutional withdrawal or profit-taking, like the one happening since the first quarter of 2021.
On-chain analytics service Skew reported Thursday that GBTC stopped attracting fresh investments after February 2021.
The GBTC premium was upward of 30% at the beginning of this year. But the latest Skew chart pinpoints it at -11.40%. GBTC’s premium to its NAV was –40.20% at its sessional low, its worst level in history.
Seres Lu, vice president of Grayscale Investments, updated Cointelegraph that the firm closed its various trusts for new investments. He said:
“The capital inflows paused because Grayscale periodically closes its various trusts for administrative purposes, and GBTC was closed on March 2nd, and remains closed, to new investments.”
Meanwhile, GBTC premium logged mild recoveries in early April after Grayscale announced its intentions to convert its trust structure to an exchange-traded fund. The New York firm’s decision came in the wake of growing competition from then-newly launched ETFs in Canada, primarily as they offered better expense ratios than Grayscale’s.
For instance, Purpose, the world’s first physically settled Bitcoin ETF, surfaced with an expense ratio of 1%. Evolve and CI Galaxy, other Canadian Bitcoin ETFs, offered 0.75% and 0.40%, respectively. Meanwhile, Grayscale’s expense ratio was a heightened 2%.
Business rivalries with Canadian Bitcoin ETFs might have also choked capital inflows into GBTC. Purpose, for instance, raked in $1 billion in capital per month after its launch in February, reflecting that demand for Bitcoin investment products remained higher despite a plunge in GBTC’s inflows.
Musk rattled Wall Street Bitcoin investors
The period also saw Bitcoin’s spot rate riding higher on the Elon Musk factor. Following Tesla’s revelation that it was holding $1.5 billion worth of BTC on its balance sheets, the cost to purchase one Bitcoin rose from as low as $38,057 on Feb. 8 to as high as $64,899 on April 14, with speculators believing that more corporates would replace a portion of their cash holdings with the flagship cryptocurrency.
But GBTC premium stayed negative during the course of Bitcoin’s February–April price rally. Its minus 40.20% bottom appeared when BTC/USD started shedding its gains owing to profit-taking, China’s crypto ban and Tesla’s Bitcoin dump rumors.
Daniel Martins, founder of independent research firm DM Martins Research, highlighted the decline as a sign of waning Wall Street interest in Bitcoin-related investments, especially after the cryptocurrency became a clear victim of Musk’s anti-Bitcoin tweets mid-May, losing more than half its valuation at one point later.
Martins further noted that Grayscale reported 500% higher annualized returns than Nasdaq, but its correction was also worse than the 2008’s recession — 82% vs. Nasdaq’s 17%. That made Grayscale’s Bitcoin investment product an “ultra-leveraged bet,” accompanied by an inferior risk-adjusted performance. The analyst added:
“GBTC’s volatility has been nearly nine times as high as the Nasdaq’s: 145% vs. 17%.”
Grayscale ETF in 2021?
Martins’ statements highlighted possibilities that GBTC premium could face further downside moves as investors hunt for more stable alternatives against Bitcoin’s ongoing price correction.
Moreover, its rivalry from other digital currency investment alternatives, including cryptocurrency custodian services that offer institutional investors to own real crypto assets at a cheaper fee, further risks limited capital inflow.
ETF.com’s analyst Sumit Roy wrote that the Grayscale fund’s potential transition into an ETF ends its 2%-fee days, as it would need to compete with an army of other ETFs, led by firms such as Bitwise, Vanguard, Fidelity, Cboe and others. He added:
“Yet regardless of what happens, GBTC is poised to be a force and will likely stick around no matter how the crypto fund space evolves.”
But whether the United States markets will have access to a Bitcoin ETF in 2021 remains a mystery itself. Financial Times reported earlier this week that most ETF applications gather dust as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler reiterated worries about investor protection in crypto markets.
“I expect that [delay] to happen with all of our filings, to be honest,” said Laura Morrison, global head of listings at Cboe.